On Sun, 23 May 1999 sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > The OpenBSD team does a lot wrt auditing of the complete sourcetree, but > > then the question is: is this valid concern or is this pure paranoia. > > OpenBSD does a lot of valid changes but borders (and sometimes crosses thta > > border) on paranoia, wrt code. > > Given the number of postings to BUGTRAQ about array overflows and stack > smashing, I think it's relevant to ask whether it possible to be *too* > paranoid here. Personally, I think what the OpenBSD folks are doing is > very important.
One of my plans is to merge all of these changes into our tree (along with all the other minor changes/manpage corrections, etc). Longer term, I'd like to work on porting some of their kernel code like randomized sin_port selection and TCP initial sequence numbering, probably hidden behind sysctl knobs (defaulting to off to keep people happy). Kris ----- "That suit's sharper than a page of Oscar Wilde witticisms that's been rolled up into a point, sprinkled with lemon juice and jabbed into someone's eye" "Wow, that's sharp!" - Ace Rimmer and the Cat, _Red Dwarf_ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
