On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 11:52:39AM -0400, Thomas Valentino Crimi wrote: > Take a look at rtprio(2), giving yourself a realtime priority will > guarantee you the CPU until you explicitly release it (or another higher > priority realtime process comes along). I'd assume it is possible that one of the renames might block, resulting in some other process being scheduled. This would certainly be possible over NFS. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Critical (or equivalent) section in Userland? Karl Pielorz
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Userla... David Malone
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Us... Archie Cobbs
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Userla... Thomas Valentino Crimi
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Us... Karl Pielorz
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Us... David Malone
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Us... John Polstra
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Us... Warner Losh
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Userla... Warner Losh
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Us... Warner Losh
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section i... Karl Pielorz
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section i... Warner Losh
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Us... Karl Pielorz
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section i... Tony Finch
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) section i... Mikko Tyolajarvi
- Re: Critical (or equivalent) secti... Karl Pielorz