> Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >                         If it's something that can be done as eg. a KLD 
> > we might want to do that instead, or through some other mechanism for 
> > handling these sort of CPU quirks.
> 
> It sounds good.  If binary-format quriks is supported, we can supply
> update modules for new CPU and newly found errata like the update
> module for AMD K6-2 CPU of Windows 95.

Indeed.  This won't help us where we need to modify the actual behaviour 
of a system component, but when we can perform external corrective 
actions, it will help a lot.



-- 
\\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\  Mike Smith
\\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself,  \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime.             \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to