Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

[Alfred Perlstein]

* David Greenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000703 01:32] wrote:

.. response to mbuf rewrite

>    I'm not trying to 'frown upon evolution', unless the particular form of
> evolution is to make the software worse than it was. I *can* be convinced
> that your proposed changes are a good thing and I'm asking you to step up
> to the plate and prove it.

I agree, we can not afford to sacrifice performance for memory
footprint any longer, it's just not realistic.  If a subsystem
needs X amount of memory at some point in time it will need it
again.  Sacrificing performance to fix the small occurances where
this is not the case is not worth it, the general case will always
be there and will be more important.

-Alfred


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message