On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> FWIW, I'm in favor of a pointer argument as well. The way I implemented it
> was actually with a third argument, instead of changing the int to void.
> i.e.:
[...]
> I don't feel too strongly about it either way -- I suppose it's about the
> same amount of work to port older code. (I just put an ifdef in the
> sendfile code, which doesn't use the third argument in my tree.)
The u_int is really unnecessary. If the caller needs more important
information, he can pass anything he likes, including a data structure,
or even a pointer to the mbuf. So this information can be extracted in
either case.
>
> Ken
> --
> Kenneth Merry
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Bosko Milekic * Voice/Mobile: 514.865.7738 * Pager: 514.921.0237
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.technokratis.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
