On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Michael Bacarella wrote: > It seems silly to implement something as trivial and straightforward as > copying a file in userland. The process designated to copy a file just > sits in a tight loop invoking the read()/write() syscalls > repeatedly. Since this operation is already system bound and very simple, > what's the arguement against absorbing it into the kernel? > VMS To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Gérard Roudier
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Kent Stewart
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Narvi
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Kent Stewart
- Re: Double buffered cp... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Double buffered cp... Kent Stewart
- Re: Double buffered cp... Dan Nelson
- Re: Double buffered cp... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Double buffered cp... Kent Stewart
- Re: Double buffered cp... sthaug
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Brian Beattie
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Brian Fundakowski Feldman
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Matthew Dillon
- RE: Double buffered cp(1) Koster, K.J.
- RE: Double buffered cp(1) Kris Kennaway
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Aleksandr A.Babaylov
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Warner Losh
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Aleksandr A.Babaylov
- Re: Double buffered cp(1) Warner Losh