Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Gustavo V G C Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000406 19:12] wrote: > > Considering the current kernel design approach used by traditional > > system, what happens if a drive were wrongly coded ? > > > > Would the entiry system crash ? > > please define "wrongly coded". Definition: the driver tries to access a memory outside its memory space. Worse yet: What about hardware buggy devices? This could case the entiry system to crash, isn't it ? -- If you're happy, you're successful. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stab... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel rea... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional unixes kerne... Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: Is traditional unixes kerne... Nick Sayer
- Re: Is traditional unixes k... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional unix... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is traditional unixes kerne... Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: Is traditional unixes kerne... Wes Peters
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel rea... Warner Losh
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Matthew Dillon