On Wed, 05 Apr 2000, Daniel Sobral wrote:
> > But that IS the way CVS works. There is NO "STABLE" tag. The tag is
> > "RELENG_4".
> >
> > If you want CVS to reflect the way you describe the system, you would
> > have to change the repository to match your description. I advocate that
> > we change the description to match the repository.
>
> Ah, you are asking for we dropping "stable" completely, and simple refer
> to the (stable) branches as RELENG_3, RELENG_4, etc? Sorry, I had
> misunderstood you.
Naturally, I would not use the "RELENG_" but refer to them as FreeBSD-3
or some other isomorphic usr-friendly label.
I would get rid of "-STABLE" part of elsewhere because it is redundant.
However, I would not discard "STABLE" entirely. I would just make an
alias or symbolic link to the most recent release that deserves that
"blessing".
BTW, I think it was a mistake to attach the "blessing" so soon after the
branch was created. But that is another discussion.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
