> Juergen Lock writes:
> > > when this is done the netgraph PPP nodes (which can support
> > > these compression types will be usable.
> >
> > They could, but they don't yet, right? :)
> >
> > Maybe it still should be added to ijppp first cause debugging user
> > processes is easier than the kernel... and at the usual isdn bri
> > speeds a user process should still be pretty fast enough.
>
> That makes perfect sense.. just be sure to write the code so that
> it's easily ported to the kernel.. the main issues being mbuf's..
> for that it's probably eassiest to just punt and copy each packet
> into a contiguous buffer.
I've done a small amount of work on making ppp(8)-style mbufs look
more like real mbufs with this in mind. If I can bring the whole
interface in line, this problem will go away. Of course this'll
probably then introduce a compatibility problem with {Net,Open}BSD...
> -Archie
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com
--
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
