In the last episode (Jan 05), Ronald F. Guilmette said: > Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >When your code breaks when using -O2 or higher, don't do that, use > >just -O! > > Ah, excuse me, but -O is equivalent to -O2. /usr/src/contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4821 if (!strcmp (argv[i], "-O")) { optimize = 1; optimize_size = 0; } So, -O is equivalent to -O1. Go down one page from there, and you'll see the individual optiomizations enabled by each level. Also note that for stock gcc, there is nothing above -O3 (If you see someone using anything higher, you can be sure they're using pgcc). The -Os flag automatically sets -O2. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: alt. C compiler Peter da Silva
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Warner Losh
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Thomas David Rivers
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Thomas David Rivers
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: alt. C compiler Peter da Silva
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Martin Cracauer
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Dan Nelson
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Martin Cracauer
- RE: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Charles Randall
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Oliver Fromme
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Patryk Zadarnowski
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Warner Losh