Re: AIO was Re: Kernel threads

[Wes Peters]

Kip Macy wrote:
> 
> >
> > The best fix I've thought of thus far (other than async I/O, which I
> > understand isn't ready for prime time) would be to have a number of kernel
> 
> Speaking of AIO, which I would really like to use if possible, how
> actively maintained is it? The copyright on vfs_aio.c is 1997, suggesting
> to me that John Dyson has moved onto other things.

It's passively maintained.  ;^)

I've become a little familiar with the code, and BDE has graciously agreed
to review whatever I do to make sure I don't hobble it.  If you need help,
yell.

-- 
            "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                           http://softweyr.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message