On 29-Dec-99 Ken Bolingbroke wrote:
> From my own experience, altho I'm not that skilled a programmer,
> sleep()
> is not thread-safe. I believe sleep() sets a global SIGALARM, which
> is
> reset by every thread that calls it, and thus only the last one ever
> returns. Replacing sleep() with nanosleep() or something else that
> is
> thread-safe should solve that problem.
Stupid question time..
If that is so why doesn't sleep just use nanosleep? :)
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message