The recent discussion about route table leaks led me to check some
of my systems.  On one of them I got this:

bash-2.03$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386
bash-2.03$ uptime
 7:45AM  up 28 days, 12:38, 3 users, load averages: 0.61, 0.50, 0.43
bash-2.03$ vmstat -m | grep routetbl | grep K
     routetbl    60     8K     15K 40960K     1870    0     0  16,32,64,128,256
     routetbl    60     8K     15K 40960K     1870    0     0  16,32,64,128,256
     routetbl    60     8K     15K 40960K     1870    0     0  16,32,64,128,256

Eh... *Three* entries?

In fact, lots of stuff is triplicated (or more):

bash-2.03$ vmstat -m | sort | less
[snip]
          kld    16    79K     84K 40960K       40    0     0  
16,32,128,512,1K,4K,8K,64K
          kld    16    79K     84K 40960K       40    0     0  
16,32,128,512,1K,4K,8K,64K
          kld    16    79K     84K 40960K       40    0     0  
16,32,128,512,1K,4K,8K,64K
          kld    16    79K     84K 40960K       40    0     0  
16,32,128,512,1K,4K,8K,64K
[etc]

And this:

bash-2.03$ vmstat -m | less
[snip]
  64  file, lockf, namecache, devbuf, temp, session, shm, pcb,
          cluster_save buffer, vnodes, ifaddr, routetbl, NFS req, NFS daemon,
          file, lockf, namecache, devbuf, temp, session, shm, pcb,
          cluster_save buffer, vnodes, ifaddr, routetbl, NFS req, NFS daemon,
          file, lockf, namecache, devbuf, temp, session, shm, pcb,
          cluster_save buffer, vnodes, ifaddr, routetbl, NFS req, NFS daemon,
          file

This doesn't look healthy to me.  I didn't see anything about this in the
archives...

-- 
Robert Withrow -- (+1 978 288 8256)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to