David Greenman wrote:
>
> >
> >Sorry, I forgot to say about the above. Since Wes Peters suggested that it
> >might be a 82558, it put the above name. Please correct it to whatever the
> >name should be.
>
> From your other email it sounds like it has an 82559. Intel has been
> shipping that for more than a year as well on boards that ID as 0x1229,
> so apparantly the chip being used doesn't correlate with the ID number.
> In this case I'd recommend changing the above defines to "FXP_DEVICE_ID_1"
> and "FXP_DEVICE_ID_2" respectively. If you are confident that your 0x1230
> Pro/100 is working correctly, including stuff related to manual selection
> of the speed and duplex, then I'll take care of making the changes to
> the driver.
This might be the new 82559ER; I'm downloading the datasheet now. Have
a peek at:
http://developer.intel.com/design/network/datashts/index.htm
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
