Wes Peters wrote: > > It's not broken in this case. 2^16 (st_dev) is certainly enough to uniquely > indentify all mounted filesystems, and 2^32 is (by definition) enough to > uniquely indentify each of the files on a filesystem. Discussions (with > strong, valid reasons) about expanding the size of ino_t should be carried > out on -arch. Just to expand a little bit more, some distributed filesystems *do not* have a unique identifier like the inode. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Then again maybe not going to heaven would be a blessing. Relkin liked a certain amount of peace and harmony, since there'd been a pronounced shortage of them in his own life; however, nothing but peace and harmony, forever and forever? He wasn't sure about that. And no beer? Very dubious proposition." To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Portable way to compare struct stat's? Kelly Yancey
- Re: Portable way to compare struct stat's? Wes Peters
- Re: Portable way to compare struct stat's? Robert Watson
- Re: Portable way to compare struct stat's? John Polstra
- Re: Portable way to compare struct stat... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Portable way to compare struct... John Polstra
- Re: Portable way to compare st... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Portable way to compar... Wes Peters
- Re: Portable way to compar... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Portable way to compar... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Portable way to compar... Wes Peters
- Re: Portable way to compar... Robert Watson
- Re: Portable way to compar... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Portable way to compar... Wes Peters
- Re: Portable way to compar... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Portable way to compar... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Portable way to compar... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Portable way to compar... Wes Peters
- Re: Portable way to compar... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Portable way to compare st... Garance A Drosihn