Re: Procfs' pointers to files.

[Daniel C. Sobral]

Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> 
> It sounds to me that what you really want are the semantics of a
> symbolic link and not the semantics of a hard link.  Is it just me,
> or does it seem as if the pathname of the executable being stored as
> a virtual symlink in procfs as "file" would solve these security
> problems?

Mmmmm... I like that...

--
Daniel C. Sobral                        (8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

        What y'all wanna do?
        Wanna be hackers? Code crackers? Slackers
        Wastin' time with all the chatroom yakkers?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message