> > That's correct; it's why the ia32 architecture has a '32' in its name. > > I don't believe that's true. I don't have any hard evidence within easy > reach, but with the introduction of the Pentium, the address space was > increased. A user process, of course, can only have 4G of addressible > space (32-bit addresses) but the OS can map pages of the 4G space into a > larger area. > > Something to do with 4MB pages instead of 4K pages. > > Again, I could be wrong on this one. Think about it for a second. How big is a pointer? -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Michael Beckmann
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Scott Hess
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Michael Beckmann
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Matthew Dillon
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Sergey Babkin
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Scott Hess
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Chuck Youse
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD John Baldwin
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Matthew Dillon
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Lars Gerhard Kuehl
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Dan Nelson
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Oren Sarig
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Chuck Youse
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Patryk Zadarnowski
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD John Baldwin
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Sergey Babkin
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Michael Walker
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Barrett Richardson
- Re: Limitations in FreeBSD Ollivier Robert