Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Thomas David Rivers writes:
> > > If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
> > [...]
> >
> > You're approach would probably work, but there's an easier way.
> > See topic 28 in the Xt FAQ.
> >
> > ftp://ftp.x.org/contrib/faqs/FAQ-Xt
> >
> > It's not name mangling causing problems, it's lack of "this" when the
> > method is invoked as a callback from Xt.
>
> Yes! This is the method! I like it, or at least, it's as close (in C++
> code) to something I do like.
I assume they're using a static member function for the callback and storing
the this pointer for the object somewhere handy? This is the canonical way
to re-enter C++ code from C land, and can even be used for C++ interrupt
handlers if you're very careful.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
