Geoff Buckingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >In an effort to avoid what may follow, I fully appreciate HTTP 1.1 vhosting >is much more appropriate in many situations, this does not however >remove the need for large scale conventional virtual hosting alltogether. I'll also mention SSL, since it requires an IP address per virtual host. Tony. -- dot it at To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Sam Samalin
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Mike Nowlin
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Nick Hilliard
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases John Hay
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Mike Bristow
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Geoff Buckingham
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Tony Finch
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Matthew Reimer
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Tony Finch
- Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases Nick Hilliard