On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > You should note that neither QNX nor FreeBSD exhibit the above > behaviour. KLD is a linker; it allows you to link more stuff into the > kernel after it's been started. It doesn't implement a coprocess model > of any sort. Yes, I knew this for FreeBSD, and for QNX, well, Slashdot again proves to be totally unreliable. :) > Indeed it would. There's some fairly strong resistance to this being > the _only_ way that FreeBSD works, but the level of modularity you I don't think this is a good idea but it would certainly be a swank thing to see. Is it possible to compile a kernel with no filesystems supported and have the boot loader load FFS? I have built an FFS module but I have not yet had time to test it. Frankly, I am kind of afraid to for fear of trashing my system. > > Has anyone else thought about this? Is this a good idea? Is this a > > bad idea? > > Yes, Yes, Yes. Could you claify this? :) Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
