: :Matthew Dillon wrote: :> :> What it all comes down to is a juxtaposition of what people believe :> is appropriate verses what people are actually willing to code up. :> I'm willing to code up my importance mechanism idea. The question is :> whether it's a good enough idea to throw into the tree. : :I think it's a good idea. It lets the admin introduce bias in the :system to protect people/processes who are more likely to use huge :amount of memory. Alas, taking the swap space into account in :addition to RSS seems more important to me. But then, I'm happy with :the way things are right now. : :-- :Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) I'm going to implement and commit this idea into -CURRENT unless someone screams. I think it would be an excellent base on top of which future sohpistication can be added. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Nate Williams
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Matthew Dillon
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Matthew Dillon
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Wes Peters
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Chuck Robey
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Matthew Dillon
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Daniel C. Sobral
- Sleeping in low memory situations (was re: 3.3 locku... Matthew Dillon
- Sleeping in low memory situations (was re: 3.3 locku... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Sleeping in low memory situations (was re: 3.3 l... Nate Williams
- Re: Sleeping in low memory situations (was re: 3.3 l... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Sleeping in low memory situations (was re: 3.3 l... Nate Williams
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R David Scheidt
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Nate Williams
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Wes Peters
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Chuck Robey
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Wes Peters
- Re: Out of swap handling and X lockups in 3.2R Chuck Robey