Thanks! Mine reports (after patching):
fxp0@pci0:13:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10308086 chip=0x10308086 rev=0x08 hdr=0x00
I have no clue what is really the right way to do it, but here is
the tiny patch I made anyway:
*** if_fxpreg.h.orig Sat Sep 4 13:33:29 1999
--- if_fxpreg.h Sun Sep 5 14:30:42 1999
***************
*** 29,34 ****
--- 29,35 ----
#define FXP_VENDORID_INTEL 0x8086
#define FXP_DEVICEID_i82557 0x1229
+ #define FXP_DEVICEID_i82559 0x1030
#define FXP_PCI_MMBA 0x10
#define FXP_PCI_IOBA 0x14
*** if_fxp.c.orig Sat Sep 4 13:33:29 1999
--- if_fxp.c Sun Sep 5 14:40:44 1999
***************
*** 510,516 ****
if (((device_id & 0xffff) == FXP_VENDORID_INTEL) &&
((device_id >> 16) & 0xffff) == FXP_DEVICEID_i82557)
return ("Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet");
!
return NULL;
}
--- 510,518 ----
if (((device_id & 0xffff) == FXP_VENDORID_INTEL) &&
((device_id >> 16) & 0xffff) == FXP_DEVICEID_i82557)
return ("Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet");
! else if (((device_id & 0xffff) == FXP_VENDORID_INTEL) &&
! ((device_id >> 16) & 0xffff) == FXP_DEVICEID_i82559)
! return ("Intel InBusiness 10/100 Ethernet");
return NULL;
}
For anyone who is interested, I bought these cards at CompUSA because
they were cheap. There is a sticker on them with the net address
followed by "32913" and then "742252-001".
Steve
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Steven E Lumos wrote:
>>
>> According to some posts I've found with deja and by searching the
>> mailing lists, these cards are now supported in the fxp driver. Since
>> the string "82559" does not appear either in the CVS logs, nor the
>> latest version of the driver available for CVS, I need somebody to tell
>> me which version of the driver has 82559 support. Specifically, is
>> there a version that I can build in a 3.1 source tree, and if not then
>> what is the minimum amount of work I can do to get a working system
>> with this card supported.
>>
>> One of the posts I saw said that there was support in 3.2, but the
>> GENERIC 3.2 kernel (from the June 1999 CDs) doesn't recognise the
>> card. The card is an Intel InBusiness 10/100.
>
>Find out what the device ID is. I have an 82559 card running right now,
>and it ran under 3.1-RELEASE as well as it's software compatable with the
>82557/8.
>
>Under -current: pciconf -l reports:
>fxp0@pci0:11:0: class=0x020000 card=0x000c8086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x08 hdr=0x
>00
>
>Under 3.1-release (network installed from floppy), and later upgraded to
>3.2-stable:
>
>Aug 30 12:59:14 auth /kernel: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 15 11:08:08 GMT
>19
>99
>[..]
>Aug 30 12:59:14 auth /kernel: fxp0: <Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet>
>re
>v 0x08 int a irq 11 on pci0.11.0
>Aug 30 12:59:14 auth /kernel: fxp0: Ethernet address 00:90:27:58:42:9f
>
>The card was an OEM version, I don't know *exactly* what it's called, and it
>has no identifying marks, but it's intel-style model number is: 721383-006.
>This is on the sticker on the front next to the ethernet address and
>another number "10927", which could mean anything.
>
>The Intel docs for this chip say explicitly that it's software compatable
>with drivers for older versions.
>
>An older board with an 82557 or 558 on the motherboard has:
>fxp0@pci0:6:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x
>00
>The device ID's are the same, just a lower revision number. ^^^^^^^^
>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Steve
>
>Cheers,
>-Peter
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
