Re: [mount.c]: Option "user"-patch

[adrian]

On Thu, Sep 02, 1999, Boris Popov wrote:

> > without needing yet another setuid binary/binaries..
> 
>       Well, sysctl with list of pathes for user mounts looks good.
> Configuration is simple and can be easliy changed at runtime. It is
> always better to avoid setuid'ed binaries, this is more worse that
> mount(8) can execute other mount_* binaries. 
> 
>       However, as pointed by Mike Smith, enabling user mounts raises a
> risc of kernel panics from, for example, corrupted floppy disk. This
> should lead to more stronger *fs code.


Ahh, another discussion entirely, which I'm not going to get into
without working code. :-)




Adrian


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message