> > Why not do this as part of the port itself, ala majordomo? That > > works just fine and is completely non-controversial because you don't get > > it unless you ask for it. > > I would just liek to point out that Postfix is also doing the exact same > thing ... user postfix ... (as well as a group maildrop) Maybe a stupid question, but how do you figure out which uid is still available, if you don't want every port to include a UID scanning utility? Nick -- e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA'... Keith Stevenson
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA'... Warner Losh
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA'... Doug
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party ... Pascal Hofstee
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-pa... Nick Hibma
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3r... Doug
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username f... Keith Stevenson
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-pa... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3r... Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA'... David Wolfskill
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA'... Ollivier Robert
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party ... Mike Smith
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-pa... Markus Stumpf
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3r... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Proposal: Add generic username f... Markus Stumpf