On 28-Aug-99 Kris Kirby wrote: > Both. The problem is that you can't cram a signal moving at 10 Mbps > through a radio interface designed for 256K, even if it is bandwidth > limited to 256K. I'm hoping the 3C503 is ancient enough that I can slow > it down by yanking it's 20.0000 MHz crystal oscillator and feeding it a > lower speed signal. I'm going to walk them down to see just how far I > can go. After all, 2 Mbps isn't bad, it just requires a little more > work. Ahh eeww :) I hope you have a lot of spare time ;) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time depende... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time de... Kris Kirby
- Cheap link (was: Are the etherne... Greg Lehey
- RE: Cheap link (was: Are the eth... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Cheap link (was: Are the eth... Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time de... Nick Hibma
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Mike Smith
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Warner Losh
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Warner Losh
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Warner Losh
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Max Khon