On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Mark Newton wrote: > Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > The question I am putting to the group is whether it is "time" for us, > > with today's large disks, to increase the system-compiled default > > from 8 to 16 partitions. Instead of a-h we would have a-p > > It makes sense; We wouldn't be the first to do it either (IRIX has > supported 16 partitions per spindle for years). The same is true for OpenBSD. I too run out of partitions and am in favor of this change. I'm not sure, but I think the OpenBSD folks did something that allowed them to remain compatible with the 8 partition labels. In any case, it groks SunOS and Solaris labels on my OpenBSD sparc. Adrian -- [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ubergeeks Consulting -- http://www.ubergeeks.com/ ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITI... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITI... Mark Newton
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Adrian Filipi-Martin
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITI... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Mark Newton
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MA... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: Possibility of increasing defaul... Terry Lambert
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITI... David Greenman
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MA... Matthew Dillon
- more... Re: Possibility of increasin... Matthew Dillon
- Re: more... Re: Possibility of ... Matthew Dillon