On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 03:28:01PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Anyway, I am also puzzled as to why there would be much objection > to the option of mandatory locking. My initial systems-programming If you provide mandatory locks that can be broken, then many of the objections may disappear... Providing mandatory locks that can be broken would be rather useful, I think. Mandatory locks that cannot be broken are another matter... -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Locking in Vinum (was: Mandato... Greg Lehey
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Terry Lambert
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Greg Lehey
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Terry Lambert
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Sean Eric Fagan
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Wes Peters
- Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Man... Greg Lehey
- Re: Mandatory locking? Warner Losh
- Re: Mandatory locking? Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
- Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: Mandatory locking? Mark Murray
- Re: Mandatory locking? Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: Mandatory locking? Wes Peters
- Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
- RE: Mandatory locking? Biju Susmer
- Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
- RE: Mandatory locking? Biju Susmer