> > + log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
> > + ifp->if_name, ifp->if_unit);
>
> You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)
Yes, i've seen it suggested before alright..
> So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
> "enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts?
I don't have any objections, so developers speak up and have your say !!
apart from the tun0 problem that I described in previous messages
the suggested change seems to work perfectly..
- Cillian
PS: any thoughts on the other vapourware idea :P ?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message