Brian F. Feldman wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > If you're writing unencumbered code, placing it under > > libcompat/gnu may lead to confusion because all other > > directory paths containing gnu contain GPL'd code. > > Just stick it into libcompat. > > That doesn't fit with the current organization. > > Choose: > a. fsf > b. gnu > c. glibc d. other src/lib/libcompat/{fsf,gnu,glibc} connotes GPL code. src/lib/libcompat/other allows SysV, Solaris, Linux, etc. compatibility functions. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- libcompat proposition Brian F. Feldman
- RE: libcompat proposition Daniel O'Connor
- Re: libcompat proposition Chris Costello
- Re: libcompat proposition Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Re: libcompat proposition Warner Losh
- Re: libcompat proposition Brian F. Feldman
- Re: libcompat proposition Steve Kargl
- Re: libcompat proposition Brian F. Feldman
- Re: libcompat proposition Steve Kargl
- Re: libcompat proposition Brian F. Feldman
- Re: libcompat proposit... Warner Losh
- Re: libcompat proposit... Nate Williams
- Re: libcompat proposit... Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: libcompat proposit... Jamie Howard
- Re: libcompat proposit... Jamie Howard
- Re: libcompat proposit... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: libcompat proposit... Jamie Howard
- Re: libcompat proposit... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: libcompat proposit... Sheldon Hearn