> If it will get ALL of you to give it a rest, how about: > per-rule logging limits > logging limit raising > logging limit resetting > Which would all NOT affect the statistics? We need more input from people who use the code, to make sure they don't depend on the current 'features', or can live with changes to them. Implementing it is the easy part, making sure it's the right thing to do is the hard part. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Achim Patzner
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Julian Elischer
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Henk van Oers
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Henk van Oers
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams