Re: securelevel and ipfw zero

[Nate Williams]

> :That doesn't mean we shouldn't allow people to have an unsophisticated setup,
> :just because a sophisticated one is available. It would be useful to have
> :a per-firewall-rule counter, decrement it on each match if logging and
> :set, and be able to reset to something higher.
> :
> : Brian Fundakowski Feldman      _ __ ___ ____  ___ ___ ___  
> 
>     There may be some confusion here.  I am advocating that we *allow* the
>     zeroing of counters at secure level 3.

Sorry Matt, I missed that in my previous posting as well....  Ignore my
previous followup.



Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message