> FreeBSD can wait till unified-ipv6 is made available, since:
> - IPv6 is not that urgent task and
> - it will be messy if FreeBSD integrates KAME first,
> then switch to unified-ipv6.
Both of these remain true. I certainly see and understand the
"marketing value" of having an early IPv6 implementation, but I don't
see this as mainstream interest so much as interest on the part of
various researchers and early-adopters, all of which can go to the
KAME site and grab the patches to 3.2-stable if they want to play now,
today. If we haven't done a good enough job of making that clear and
are suffering from defections to other *BSDs because of this, then we
just need to get the word out better. :-)
It's not like nothing is available at all, simply not "officially" and
officially we have an obligation to pick the best, most technically
correct route, something which I believe we have already done. Two
merges sounds like a nightmare, and we're not suffering from NetBSD's
release constraints here. :)
> - We need some more FreeBSD commit privs for other KAME guys.
> (this is a easy part)
Yes, this is certainly the easy part. As always, just let us know
if there's anything we can do.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
