On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Modred wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:
>
> > Speaking about Layer 2 and layer 3. Does the Cisco Catalyst
> > 2924XL and the HP ProCurve 2424M and 4000M switches fall under Layer 3 or
> > just layer 2?
>
> Cisco, yes... HP, no clue (perhaps you could check their website).
>
> 2900XL Architecture Notes:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/switch/cat/2900xl \
> /tech/malbu_wp.htmhttp://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/ \
> switch/cat/2900xl/tech/malbu_wp.htm
>
> 2900XL Management Guide:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/ \
> 29_35sa6/index.htm
>
> IOW, RTFM.
I did, it gets interesting though since if it was a true Level 3
switch, it sure seems to perform more like a Level 2.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________ __ ____
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ]
Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
