In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David E. Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem indeed was conflicting libraries... (in /usr/X11R6/lib).. however
> I did place on the line *immediately* before the -lwcs a -L/usr/local/lib,
> however it appeared to take the /usr/X11R6/lib (which was in a previous -L
> statement) version instead. Is this correct?
Yes, it's correct. The -L options can appear anywhere relative to the
-l options -- even after them -- and it doesn't make any difference.
The relative ordering among the -L options with respect to *each
other* is all ld cares about. That's been the traditional behavior
on every Unix system I've ever used that supported -L at all.
John
--
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA
"No matter how cynical I get, I just can't keep up." -- Nora Ephron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
