Hi, At 1:28 pm -0400 20/7/99, Kelly Yancey wrote: >[...] > On recent thought though, I seem to recall having read in the 4.4BSD >Daemon book that having the kernel zero memory is not the preferred >practice, but present because when they tried to stop many progrems dies >which assumed memory was initialized to zero. Handing out unzeroed memory is a potential security hole. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- RE: Overcommit and calloc() Kelly Yancey
- Re: Overcommit and calloc() Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Overcommit and calloc() John-Mark Gurney
- Re: Overcommit and calloc(... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Overcommit and calloc() Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Re: Overcommit and calloc() Peter Dufault
- RE: Overcommit and calloc() Charles Randall
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Matthew Dillon
- RE: Overcommit and calloc() Kelly Yancey
- RE: Overcommit and calloc() David Wolfskill
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Bob Bishop
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Matthew Dillon
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Bob Bishop
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Matthew Dillon
- Re: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Matthew Dillon
- RE: RE: Overcommit and calloc() Kelly Yancey