Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The libc_r version number was bumped in -current because of the > addition of poll(). Is this allowed in -stable, or something > that waits for a -RELEASE? Jordan should have to say something about this. AFAIR, bumps are allowed but only by one between releases. We will have to provide libc_r.so.3 in /usr/lib/compat/compat3x, though (we'll have to do this anyway by the time 4.x is released). tg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Kip Macy
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Daniel Eischen
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Kip Macy
- new seg fault in thread code Kip Macy
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Thomas Gellekum
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Daniel Eischen
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Daniel Eischen
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Thomas Gellekum
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Thomas Gellekum
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Mike Meyer
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Daniel Eischen
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Thomas Gellekum