Hi everyone, I've been following this discussion almost from the beginning, and I have the feeling that we're not _really_ getting very far. There's good arguments for and against overcommit, depending on your point of view and your requirements. What I do see is a not-so-openly voiced consent that the way resource(sp?) shortages are handled in an overcommitting system (SIGKILL) makes some of us rather unhappy. I therefore suggest those of us who would like to see a change in this area pool their efforts and energies to work on a mechanism that handles resource shortage in a more graceful way. cheerio Michael -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2))
Michael Schuster - TSC SunOS Germany Wed, 14 Jul 1999 23:48:46 -0700
- Re: Swap overco... Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Swap ov... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap ov... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacem... Jason Thorpe
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Rep... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re:... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re:... Patrick Welche
- Re: Swap overcommit (was... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Rep... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re:... Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacem... Michael Schuster - TSC SunOS Germany
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacem... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Rep... sthaug
- Re: Swap overcommit (was Re:... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap overcommit (was... lyndon
- Re: Swap overcommit ... Sheldon Hearn
- re: Swap overco... matthew green
- Re: Swap ov... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Swap ov... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Swap ov... Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Swap ov... Daniel C. Sobral