Jason Thorpe wrote: > > That's just silly. If people want a no-overcommit system, they have it, > and if they don't, they have that, too. > > That's why you make it a switch. No, really, you *can* just make it > a switch. So, enlighten me, please... how do you switch it in NetBSD? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Would you like to go out with me?" "I'd love to." "Oh, well, n... err... would you?... ahh... huh... what do I do next?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) David Brownlee
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) David Greenman
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Mike Smith
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Niall Smart
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Michael Richardson
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Mike Smith
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Kevin Schoedel
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral