Jamie Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ahh, this is a good idea. I have not yet replaced GNU grep on my system > with this so it has not yet occurred to me that there might be issues with > that. I tried it; it works fine except for the lack of -w. Haven't tried 0.3 yet. A good test is to build lots of ports, since the ports framework uses grep a lot. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Repalcement for grep(1) Jamie Howard
- Re: Repalcement for grep(1) patl
- Re: Repalcement for grep(1) Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Repalcement for grep(1) Jamie Howard
- Re: Repalcement for grep(1) Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Repalcement for grep(1) Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jamie Howard
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jake Burkholder
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jamie Howard
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Assar Westerlund
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (par... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) ... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) ... Jon Ribbens
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) ... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) ... Jon Ribbens