> I would say it is not _acceptable_. The code shouldn't go into our > source tree until the known buffer overflow problems have been fixed. > It's just stupid to add buffer overflow problems to a program that is > always run as root. Minor correction: tcpdump will run happily as non-root as long as it can read packets from /dev/bpf. I use this all the time on my own systems, having chmod'ed /dev/bpf to readable for group wheel. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Pierre Beyssac
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Kris Kennaway
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Bill Fumerola
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Boris Popov
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Wes Peters
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Julian Elischer
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. David O'Brien
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Bill Fumerola
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Matthew Hunt
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. John Polstra
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. sthaug
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Warner Losh
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Bill Fumerola
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Stephen J. Roznowski
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Peter Jeremy
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Bob Bishop
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Julian Elischer
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. lyndon
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Dominic Mitchell
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Matthew N. Dodd