Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...)

[Anonymous]

Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Sorry to follow up on my own message, but I noted today in PCWeek
>their trip back to the benchmark lab includes ripping 3 CPUs and
>768M RAM out of the system, to benchmark how Linux and NT perform
>on "lower-end" hardware.  They also allowed the RedHat dudes to
>switch to an Adaptec SCSI controller to talk to the RAID array.  
>How are we holding up under this "diminished" configuration?

It's stupid to tune everything for performance except for the web
server -- they should be using Zeus, not Apache.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Winner, International Obfuscated C Code Competition 1998


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message