>From the keyboard of Nick Hibma:
> And as to the author: Writing docu while you are implementing something
> might work in a commercial environment where you want to be able to
> market something before it's sell-by date, but for hobbiests who
> basically spend the odd evening doing something, it is too much hassle.
In case FreeBSD wants to enter commercial environments, we have to behave
like behaving in commercial environments.
I know that it is current behaviour, much easier and obviously a commonly
accepted thing that code, subsystem and/or changes are not and need not
to be documented, but this is not a reason in itself for not changing this.
Also, i think that the argument Mike and others use: "don't complain for a
lack of things, contribute!" - which i use and used all the time - is not
valid for this issue: at least i can't contribute because i don't understand
things (now someone could argue, that i'm wrong here ...).
The last thing i want is a flamewar on this topic and i don't write this
because i want to piss onto someones shoes. And i don't write about a
man page for "ls" or "more" but a fundamental change in FreeBSD's inner
architecture.
hellmuth
--
Hellmuth Michaelis Tel +49 40 559747-70
HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH Fax +49 40 559747-77
Oldesloer Strasse 97-99 Mail hm [at] hcs.de
22457 Hamburg WWW http://www.hcs.de
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
