https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242747
--- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <c...@freebsd.org> --- I suppose it's possible that the AES-NI (or SSE) intrinsics on Epyc are just slower. I wouldn't expect such a substantial difference, though. It's also interesting that Epyc reports AES-XTS support while Xeon does not. That suggests the Xeon is running a different (older) version of FreeBSD than the Eypc. Maybe that's just from installing CURRENT on the Epyc, but for apples-to-apples comparison I'd suggest running the same version. When you installed CURRENT, did you compile a GENERIC-NODEBUG kernel / define MALLOC_PRODUCTION for world? Or is this just a snapshot published on the freebsd ftp server? If the latter, it's a debugging-enabled kernel, which will result in substantially higher sys time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-geom@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-geom-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
