Bugzilla Automation <bugzi...@freebsd.org> has asked freebsd-gecko (Nobody) <ge...@freebsd.org> for maintainer-feedback: Bug 281182: www/firefox needs a rustix/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs patch analogous to the one under lang/rust/files/armv7/ https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281182
--- Description --- For rust 1.79.0_1 vs. firefox 129.0.2_2 , the only difference needed for the content of the patch files was the file path: # diff /usr/ports/lang/rust/files/armv7/patch-vendor_rustix_src_backend_libc_fs_syscal ls.rs /usr/ports/www/firefox/files/patch-third__party_rust_rustix_src_backend_libc_fs _syscalls.rs | more 5,6c5,6 < --- vendor/rustix-0.38.28/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs.orig 2024-05-06 16:29:17.182875000 +0200 < +++ vendor/rustix-0.38.28/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs 2024-05-06 16:29:48.897744000 +0200 --- > --- third_party/rust/rustix/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs.orig 2024-05-06 16:29:17.182875000 +0200 > +++ third_party/rust/rustix/src/backend/libc/fs/syscalls.rs 2024-05-06 16:29:48.897744000 +0200 But rust and firefox have progressed since then. However, a similar point may well apply to the updated pair. This will mat†er if someone ever tries to get armv7 firefox to build (and work): This appears to be one of multiple things that are broken for that context, one I happen to have figured out via a suggestion someone made on a list.
