https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=270782
Bug ID: 270782 Summary: www/firefox: 112 fails to build on i386 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ge...@freebsd.org Reporter: zir...@freebsd.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(ge...@freebsd.org) Assignee: ge...@freebsd.org Created attachment 241430 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=241430&action=edit Workaround: force-disable SSE on i386 Building on i386 fails with these errors: --- In file included from Unified_cpp_dom_base10.cpp:74: In file included from /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-112.0/dom/base/nsTextFragment.cpp:162: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-112.0/dom/base/nsTextFragmentGeneric.h:16:48: error: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'xsimd::batch<short, xsimd::sse2>' const uint32_t numUnicharsPerVector = xsimd::batch<int16_t, Arch>::size; ^ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-112.0/dom/base/nsTextFragment.cpp:183:21: note: in instantiation of function template sp ecialization 'mozilla::FirstNon8Bit<xsimd::sse2>' requested here return mozilla::FirstNon8Bit<xsimd::sse2>(str, end); ^ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-112.0/third_party/xsimd/include/xsimd/arch/xsimd_scalar.hpp:30:11: note: template is dec lared here class batch; ^ In file included from Unified_cpp_dom_base10.cpp:74: In file included from /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-112.0/dom/base/nsTextFragment.cpp:162: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-112.0/dom/base/nsTextFragmentGeneric.h:35:31: error: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'xsimd::batch<short, xsimd::sse2>' xsimd::batch<int16_t, Arch> vectmask(static_cast<int16_t>(shortMask)); ^ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-112.0/third_party/xsimd/include/xsimd/arch/xsimd_scalar.hpp:30:11: note: template is dec lared here class batch; ^ 3 errors generated. --- I'm also attaching a workaround that allowed me to get past this, but it just force-disables any SSE* usage on i386, so that's probably not the best approach. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.