On 02/03/20 18:13, Ryan Libby wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:45 AM Alexander V. Chernikov <melif...@ipfw.ru> > wrote: >> >> 28.02.2020, 18:32, "Ryan Libby" <rli...@freebsd.org>: >>> Author: rlibby >>> Date: Fri Feb 28 18:32:36 2020 >>> New Revision: 358439 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/358439 >>> >>> Log: >>> amd64 atomic.h: minor codegen optimization in flag access >>> >>> Previously the pattern to extract status flags from inline assembly >>> blocks was to use setcc in the block to write the flag to a register. >>> This was suboptimal in a few ways: >>> - It would lead to code like: sete %cl; test %cl; jne, i.e. a flag >>> would just be loaded into a register and then reloaded to a flag. >>> - The setcc would force the block to use an additional register. >>> - If the client code didn't care for the flag value then the setcc >>> would be entirely pointless but could not be eliminated by the >>> optimizer. >>> >>> A more modern inline asm construct (since gcc 6 and clang 9) allows for >> This effectively restricts kernel builds by all older compilers. >> Is there any chance of making it conditional depending on the compiler >> version/features? > > Yes, it is possible to test for __GCC_ASM_FLAG_OUTPUTS__. It is more > maintenance effort going forward. If building current with an old cross > compiler is an important scenario, we can either revert this and the > following revision or work up a patch to make it conditional. I'll see > what that might look like. >
Actually this causes emulators/virtualbox-ose port to fail to build: In file included from /usr/src/sys/sys/systm.h:44: /usr/include/machine/atomic.h:230:1: error: invalid output constraint '=@cce' in asm ATOMIC_CMPSET(char); ^ /usr/include/machine/atomic.h:205:4: note: expanded from macro 'ATOMIC_CMPSET' : "=@cce" (res), /* 0 */ \ ^ /usr/include/machine/atomic.h:230:1: error: invalid output constraint '=@cce' in asm (and so on) the virtualbox-ose port is forced to use an older clang version due to crashes when compiled with newer ones. Not sure whose responsibility is to fix this. Should I file a bug report on bugzilla? -- Guido Falsi <madpi...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"