On Sat, Dec 7, 2013, at 2:02, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> Am 06.12.2013 23:24 schrieb "Eitan Adler" <li...@eitanadler.com>:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich <de...@bluelife.at>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 06.12.2013 21:45 schrieb "Eitan Adler" <li...@eitanadler.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I get the following when try to run VirtualBox.
> > >>
> > >> VirtualBox: Error -610 in supR3HardenedMainInitRuntime!
> > >> VirtualBox: dlopen("/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxRT.so",) failed:
> > >> /usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required
> > >> by /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxRT.so not found
> > >>
> > >> %pkg info -x compat9x
> > >> compat9x-amd64-9.2.902000.201310
> > >> %pkg info -x virtualbox
> > >> virtualbox-ose-4.2.18_1
> > >> virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.2.18
> > >>
> > >> Any ideas how for to fix this?
> > >
> > > Deinstall the compat port(s) and it will work again.
> >
> > I need the compat port for Java. Is it possible to have VirtualBox
> > ignore the compat libs? why is it looking their anyway?
>
> I think it's a similar problem as described in ports/182468 and for some
> reason rtld seems to pickup libs from compat which might be correct in
> general but it's causing problems for us.
>
We discussed this in IRC the other day, Bernard. Look at the rpath (
readelf -d )of /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxRT.so -- it's wrong. It's
only listing /usr/local/lib/virtualbox.
/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose > make -V LDFLAGS
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46
Why aren't the virtualbox binaries ignoring those LDFLAGS?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
