Great, thanks … now some questions / clarifications …

First, am running both 9.x Guest and Host, so kern.hz is apparently 
auto-detected, so I'm covered there … 

Second, bridged adapter …  I just read 
http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/netgraph.html, and checking kldstat, it looks 
like netgraph is auto-loaded (I didn't compile it into the kernel, or add it to 
/boot/loader.conf) … so it isn't 'if' I use netgraph, but bridged networking 
automatically requires netgraph?   I've been getting weird behaviour with my 
virtual box, in that if I try and copy a bunch of data in (ie. rsync a 
'template' from outside of virtual box into virtual box), after awhile, I'll 
get the whole server to stop processing packets for 5 minutes (sometimes more, 
sometimes less) and then it suddenly just starts processing again … is this how 
that issue manifests itself?  Or would those be unrelated?

Finally, storage controller … again, running 9.x Host / Guest … my devices are 
coming up as /dev/ada0 … but showvminfo shows me running an IDE controller:

Storage Controller Name (0):            IDE Controller
Storage Controller Type (0):            PIIX4
Storage Controller Instance Number (0): 0
Storage Controller Max Port Count (0):  2
Storage Controller Port Count (0):      2
Storage Controller Bootable (0):        on


According to the docs for storagectl, my options are:

                            [--add <ide/sata/scsi/floppy>]
                            [--controller <LsiLogic|LSILogicSAS|BusLogic|
                                          IntelAhci|PIIX3|PIIX4|ICH6|I82078>]

So, SATA better then IDE … SCSI better (or worse?) then SATA?   I tend to have 
a bias towards SCSI, not even sure why I went IDE when I first started using 
VirtualBox …  And what about Controller?  the Tuning guide doesn't make any 
recommendations in that regard … 

Thanks ...




On 2013-04-14, at 10:17 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich <de...@bluelife.at> wrote:

> 
> Am 15.04.2013 05:13 schrieb "Marc Fournier" <scra...@hub.org>:
> >
> >
> > Are there any optimizations suggested for running FreeBSD Guest within 
> > VirtualBox on a FreeBSD Host?   Not running X in there or anything, just a 
> > straight shell …
> 
> It is probably hidden too good to find it easily.
> 
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/VirtualBox/Tuning
> 

_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to