On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:09:44PM -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2013, at 16:59 , Jimmy Kelley <ljboi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:42:26AM -0800, George Neville-Neil wrote: > >> > >> On Nov 11, 2013, at 8:00 , Achilleas Mantzios > >> <ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Hallo, > >>> 1st off thanx for the efforts for eclipse the port all those years. > >>> Are there any plans to port Kepler (Eclipse 4.3) in the near future? > >>> Just took a look at the Juno patches (pheww... doable but lots of work). > >>> > >> > >> A few of us have talked about it, but it is, indeed, a lot of work. > >> > >> That being said we do need a plan. My original idea was to retire > >> the current eclipse port and move eclipse-devel over to be just eclipse. > >> Then we could get started on doing a new eclipse-devel which would > >> be 4.3, or, perhaps 4.4 > >> > >> Best, > >> George > >> > >> > > > > Greetings, one and all... > > > > I am pleased to announce that I do believe I have the port for > > Eclipse Kepler (4.3) ready to go! You can download the gzipped > > shar file from http://webpages.charter.net/ljboiler/eclipseKepler.shar.gz > > I put this info into PR 180243. > > > > I have named this eclipse4-kepler. My 2-cents worth on rearranging the > > existing ports: move eclipse to eclipse3-indigo (some people might still > > be using or need this version), move eclipse-devel to eclipse4-juno, add > > this new one with the name I've given it, and eclipse-devel can be added > > in the near future as an update to the kepler version. From what I've seen > > from other ports, a non -devel version points to a very specific version or > > tag, whereas the -devel version usually tracks the 'head' version of a > > work-in-progress; since the eclipse source is now coming straight from > > a Git repo, I can see this being very easy to make the eclipse-devel port > > track and truely be a "use at your own risk, bleeding edge" version of > > eclipse. > > > > I would like to warn people that much has changed with how things get built > > with Eclipse Kepler compared to earlier Eclipse ports. Currently, the > > source straight from the Eclipse repo builds EVERY flavor of the Eclipse > > SDK/platform they release: win32/linux/hp/macosx/... with gtk/motif/win32 > > GUI. > > Most of the porting work was to hack out all that and only build a FreeBSD > > flavor (unless you could spare several hours and 40+G disk space). I'd say > > that a machine with 2G RAM minimum is needed, and still plenty of disk > > space: > > 10G in the ports distfiles area and almost 3G in the port working directory. > > ALSO... a working network connection is needed during the build phase, which > > (from a post to the ports mailing list this last week or so) tells me that > > this > > might not be able to be built by the automatic port building/packaging > > cluster; > > something about network access only being allowed during the fetch phase of > > building > > a port. Even with a always-on network connection, be warned that there have > > been too many times I've run into various servers or their mirrors being > > down > > when trying to build this and having to start it over (sorry, maven builds > > don't fail gracefully, and are hard to pick up from where an error > > occurred). > > > > Needs openjdk7 to build, runs on either openjdk6 or openjdk7 (default). > > Ran into a bug when running on openjdk7 and debugging a java app targeted > > for openjdk7, which was also seen by someone using Netbeans (which makes > > me think it's a openjdk7 bug): something is looking for libntp.so and can't > > find it even though it's right there in the openjdk7/jre/lib/i386 directory, > > and the "fix" is to symlink that into /usr/local/lib. > > > > Seen a few screen redrawing glitches, which clear up for me on my > > mutli-desktop > > window manager (i3) by switching to a different desktop and back. > > > > The port has options to install the full SDK (what the previous Eclipse > > ports built), > > or just the Eclipse platform (without all the Java and Plugin development > > stuff), which might be useful for people that use just the CDT or other > > language tools. > > > > Enjoy! > > > > Great that you’re working on this. I tried a naive build today (i..e just > download, unpack into my local > ports, and attempt a build) on 11. > > [exec] gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/home/gnn/svn/head-ports/java/eclipse4-kepler/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator/eclipse.platform.swt.binaries/bundles/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.freebsd.x86_64/tmpdir' > [exec] cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-std=c++11" > [exec] gmake[2]: *** [xpcomxul.o] Error 1 > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > [INFO] > [INFO] eclipse-platform-parent ........................... SUCCESS [0.346s] > [INFO] rt.equinox.framework .............................. SUCCESS [0.010s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.osgi .................................. SUCCESS [22.370s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.osgi.services ......................... SUCCESS [0.791s] > [INFO] rt.equinox.bundles ................................ SUCCESS [0.010s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.equinox.common ........................ SUCCESS [6.326s] > [INFO] eclipse.platform.ui ............................... SUCCESS [0.008s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.core.commands ......................... SUCCESS [6.264s] > [INFO] eclipse.platform.runtime .......................... SUCCESS [0.008s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.core.jobs ............................. SUCCESS [4.845s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.equinox.registry ...................... SUCCESS [5.306s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.equinox.preferences ................... SUCCESS [4.938s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.core.contenttype ...................... SUCCESS [4.962s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable ........... SUCCESS [6.725s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.core.databinding.property ............. SUCCESS [5.824s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.core.databinding ...................... SUCCESS [5.960s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.equinox.app ........................... SUCCESS [4.713s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.core.runtime .......................... SUCCESS [5.070s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.core.expressions ...................... SUCCESS [4.965s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.e4.core.di ............................ SUCCESS [4.440s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.e4.core.contexts ...................... SUCCESS [4.585s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.e4.core.services ...................... SUCCESS [4.390s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.e4.core.commands ...................... SUCCESS [0.399s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.e4.core.di.extensions ................. SUCCESS [0.242s] > [INFO] eclipse.platform.swt .............................. SUCCESS [0.008s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.swt ................................... SUCCESS [6.003s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.equinox.bidi .......................... SUCCESS [4.603s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.swt.gtk.freebsd.x86_64 ................ FAILURE [11.443s] > [INFO] org.eclipse.jface ................................. SKIPPED > > > I wonder if we need a GCC setting? > > Bset, > George >
I've updated the shar to fix this... Jimmy _______________________________________________ freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-eclipse-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
