On 12/23/06, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:03:06 +0300 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> It is by tradition that we use shorter unambiguous
> mailing-list addresses as port's maintainers ad-
> dresses. There are several ports with the following
> long addresses in the collection:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please change them to their counterparts without
> the "freebsd-" prefix, give me a go-ahead if you
> want me to change them, leave this message unan-
> swered if you don't care (I'll change them after a
> time-out), or speak up if you have anything against
> the change.
Since I've seen many commits to GNATS last months to change
those addresses to canonical names (freebsd-*), it seems to
me that current policy is quite the opposite.
Do you mean problem reports?
Please understand that with over 5600 ports pointing to
FreeBSD mailing-lists just "many" may not be enough. Of
them all only 43 have "freebsd-"-prefixed addresses.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
